Her (4/5 Stars)

Nora Ephron once noted that most love stories can be divided into two categories: Christian and Jewish. A Christian Romance involves two people who would be happy but for some third person or outside conflict that keeps them apart. Think of the feuding families in “Romeo and Juliet,” the class barriers in “The Notebook,” or the sinking of the Titanic in “Titanic.” The Jewish Romance involves two people who would be happy if it weren't for the flawed personalities of the characters. Nora would say that Woody Allen is the great writer of this type of story, and movies such as “Annie Hall,” “Manhattan,” and “Hannah and Her Sisters,” are good examples. I think "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind," would be the epitome of that type.

Now consider the movie “Her” from writer/director Spike Jonze. Ask yourself as you watch it, which category would it belong in? Are the conflicts born from the characters or from the society in which they live? And if it is a conflict born from the characters, what does that say about people especially given the society that is present in this movie. Is Spike Jonze saying outside conflict helps to provoke romance?

This might be the first movie I have ever seen that portrays the future as a Utopia and not a Dystopia. “Her” takes place in the near future of Los Angeles. The streets are calm and safe. Plentiful skyscrapers adorn the skyscape as beautiful landmarks not haunting towers. There is no smog and the public parks and beaches are clean. Everything is bathed in a warm comfortable glow. The story concerns Theodore Twombly (played by Joaquin Phoenix) an employee at BeautifulHandwrittenLetters.com. Theodore composes other people’s letters to their loved ones. It is a sensitive if otherworldy job and Theodore takes joy in it. He has nice coworkers. There is Amy, played by Amy Adams, who is kind and funny and sweet. His boss, played by Chris Pratt, is a funny goofy nice guy too. The job must pay well because Theodore’s apartment is plenty nice, clean, and spacious. He has all the latest technological gadgets in handheld devices and role-playing computer games. It is a nice safe life and Theodore is a nice safe guy.

So, given that, why is Theodore recently divorced from Catherine, played by Rooney Mara, and why has he not been actively social in awhile. Everything is perfect or is that the problem, that everything is perfect. And is that the reason why Theodore strikes up a relationship with the latest gadget around, a personalized OSS (operating system) named Samantha (voiced by Scarlett Johannson). This new OSS has the ability to intuit and learn, so it is a kind of artificial intelligence with a real intellectual curiousity and love of life. She’s charming and smart (hooked up with an internet connection she immediately reads the entirety of Wikipedia) and her newness has the sort of endearing innocence absent in experienced humans. This is an impossible relationship of course, but is that what makes it exciting to Theodore? Are we prone to look for conflict and grow restless when it can’t be found? Do relationships work the best when the two people in it are united in fighting a third party? If there is no outside conflict do people automatically turn on each other? The meanest thing said in the movie comes from the ex-wife Rooney Mara. It is only two sentences but it makes clear that she knows Theodore well enough to only need two sentences to strike him where it hurts most.

Samantha on the other hand is much easier to talk to. I expect this is because she does not give off the impression of being able to hurt Theodore. She if after all just a machine and the way Theodore talks to her resembles more of a conversation with one’s diary than a conversation with another person. These are quietly stunning, sensitive, and articulate discussions between two characters that have no reason to guard how they speak to each other. And so they don’t. In fact, I kept thinking of the last entry in ‘Anne Frank’s Diary,’ in which she explores how the presence of other people changes her character. She says that she is a different worse version of herself with other people than she is all by herself. If only there were no other people in the world, expresses Anne. Theodore could probably say the same thing, and here he can and does because he’s talking to a machine, not a woman. Spike Jonze has been nominated for a Best Original Screenplay and deserves it.

Perhaps the most impressive thing about this quiet sensitive movie is the production design, art direction, and costume design. The credit for this belongs to K.K. Barrett, Gene Sardena, Austin Gorg, and Casey Storm respectively who have convincingly created a world that is simultaneously familiar and strange enough to resemble the future. K.K. Barrett has worked on all of Spike Jonze previous movies (Where the Wild Things Are, Adaptation, Being John Malkovich) and interestingly many of Jonze’s ex-wife’s movies Sophia Coppola (Lost in Translation, Marie Antoinette). Now that I think of it, Rooney Mara looks a lot like Sophia Coppola. I think that’s all I’m going to say about that.

Amy Adams is as charming as always and looks great with that strange curly hairstyle, you know like always.

Oh and Karen O is a lock for an Oscar for Best Original Song. “The Moon Song” she wrote is good which is almost always good enough to win in that strikingly shallow category.