A review of what must be the last buddy comedy from Team Rogen/Goldberg.
Bonus: an in-depth analysis of rape jokes.
A message to all would be writers out there. There are three types of
stories you can write that do not need any type of research and which can
actually still be quite good. These include “The Coming of Age” story, the
“Romance” story, and the “Death” story. These do not need any research because
all the details can be taken directly from personal experience. As long as you
are fairly observant about what you regularly see and aren’t a total A-hole,
people should be able to empathize with the story and enjoy it. However once
these stories have exhausted themselves, any further attempts to tell the same
types of stories without making the movies about anything more than oneself
will generally feel derivative and let us be honest a bit narcissistic. At some
point in your career you must start doing that work. Let’s stop being
theoretical and start naming names.
Judd Apatow is a good example. He wrote three good movies that people
went and saw. “The 40 Year Old Virgin,” which can be accurately described as a
coming of age story. “Knocked Up” which is the romance. And “Funny People,”
which is the death story. Not a bad track record, but I don’t think anyone
bothered to see his latest movie, “This is 40.” Why? Because Judd Apatow has
basically already said everything he could about himself, and “This is 40” is
merely another movie about himself. The other three were too, but at least they
had originality. We had not seen these stories about this particular person
before.
Will Ferrell and Adam McKay are good examples of how writers can extend
their shelf life by doing work. Will Ferrell has played the same type of character
many times before (especially back in his sports comedy days) but his movies
are generally about different things. This he has done especially well with his
past few movies about regulation of wall street (The Other Guys) and politics (The
Campaign). I think it is fair to say that when Will Ferrell and Adam McKay
are writing their next movie, they might be reading some books instead of just
constantly getting high.
That should be a good segway into writing team Seth Rogen and Evan
Goldberg. They were responsible for the great Superbad, the pretty good Pineapple
Express, and now This is the End. What
all these movies have in common is that they concern a pair of two guys who are
at a crossroads in their friendship and there is some sort of intoxicant involved.
Superbad had two high school seniors
about to go to different colleges who are trying to buy alcohol for a party in
order to impress girls. Pineapple Express
is about two twenty-somethings, a pot smoker and his regular drug dealer, that
reluctantly bond while running away from drug lords. This is the End concerns two almost middle-aged guys (Seth Rogen
and Jay Baruchel) on different career tracks who reluctantly bond during the
apocalypse. It should be noted that the apocalypse happens but not before
everyone smokes a lot of pot. They also smoke a lot of pot after the apocalypse
happens. Generally, writers graduate from the “Coming of Age” story into
something else at some point. These guys are sort of doing the same story about
two friends who like to get high over and over again with just ever escalating
background drama. This has to be the last time they tell this story right? They
can’t top the apocalypse. I kept thinking of Oliver Stone’s movie “Natural Born
Killers,” while watching this movie. They are both good movies and “This is the
End” is certainly funny most of the time, but I just have this sinking feeling
that we really are watching the end here. Like Stone, the writing team has
self-imploded on pot and won’t be making anything worth seeing again. Like
drugs, movies about drug use are always better the first time or rather the
first time the characters are doing the drugs. The older the characters get,
the less fun and more sad a story that revolves around stoners gets. Imagine if
Rogen and Goldberg really did write a sequel to Pineapple Express. The actors in this movie (Jay Baruchel, Seth
Rogen, Jonah Hill, Craig Robinson, Danny McBride and James Franco) play
“themselves” and spend some time getting high, talking about the possibility and
actually making a home video version of Pineapple Express 2 while the world
burns outside. It is pretty funny, yes, but seriously do not make that movie.
This movie contains the Apocalypse but do not mistake it for a movie
about surviving the Apocalypse. Nobody here has a clue about what to do as
sinkholes to hell form in the ground, the Hollywood Hills burst into flames,
and demons of all shape and size roam the countryside killing celebrities in
brutal fashion. Most of the action takes place in James Franco’s mansion where
a huge party was taking place when the rapture started. Conveniently none of
the comedians were taken up into heaven at the beginning so we get to hear some
very funny petty arguing about who gets the last Milky Way bar, who is going to
venture outside to get water, and why aren’t we good people who get to go to
heaven. The humor ranges to pretty raunchy extremes. At some points I was
wondering why the movie did not get an NC-17 rating. I mean, usually if you
show a gigantic erect penis in a movie, it is deemed pornographic. Why does it
matter if it belongs to the devil and not a human being? Does the MPAA really
make a distinction about the difference between human penises and demon
penises? Given the R rating, I suppose it does.
In any case, given that this movie contains plenty of pretty successful
and some not so successful humor about some rather extreme stuff (and lord
knows the way things are going, movies are only going to get even more extreme)
I think now might be a good time to delve into a discussion of the proper way
to make jokes about very extreme stuff. So as a bonus to your usual review,
here is an in-depth analysis of rape jokes. We will take a look at three
examples from This is the End and try
to figure out what makes them okay/not okay and funny/not funny.
BONUS IN-DEPTH RAPE JOKE ANALYSIS
First: a note on that correct attitude for a rape joke analysis. Why
would any comedian want to tell a rape joke? Think about it this way. Any joke
in any context always teeters on the edge of funny/not funny. In many cases the
difference between people nodding along and rolling on the ground laughing has
nothing to do with the subject of the joke. It has to do with the correct
amount of voice inflection, word choice, rhythm, misdirection, and
improvisation towards the present audience. A rape joke, given the topic’s
inherent solemnity, is especially fragile. Tell a knock-knock joke badly and
people may groan. Tell a rape joke wrong and you may seriously hurt someone’s
feelings. Having said that, the best rape joke will always be better than the
best knock-knock joke given the way that certain jokes work. (Why that is will
be explained.) Because of this telling a great rape joke is a bit like scaling
Mount Everest. They can get big laughs, only the best comedians can do it, and
if you try it without knowing what you are doing you just might die in the
process. For those reasons jokes about rape and plenty other very taboo
subjects are continually attempted by comedians. They are either successful or
not. What needs to be understand however is that the main purpose of the joke
is to make people laugh not to promote rape.
Let’s lay down some ground rules. These come from Sigmund Freud’s joke book Jokes and Their Relationship to the Subconscious. I have not found
a better explanation of how jokes work and believe me it is not from a lack of
trying. Comedians sometimes try to explain why things are funny but
unfortunately a lot of them are kind of in the dark when it comes to their craft,
or are guided mainly by instinct which should explain why one of the best
movies about telling a joke, The
Aristocrats, is not especially funny.
Freud says there are three causes of laughter. I will label them jokes
of Efficiency, Misdirection, or Hostility. This
is the End has a rape joke for each one. Let’s start with the easiest to
explain.
Efficient Joke telling, Freud says, is the art of not using as few words
as possible but using too few words. Take a pun for example: a Buddhist monk
refused anesthesia at his local dentist’s office. His goal: Transcend dental
medication. The pun conveys two meanings in the space of one. In this way, it
saves the brain psychic energy, which is released in the form of a sense of
relief and laughter. Take note that if I phrased the joke differently it would
not be funny. A Buddhist refused anesthesia at his local dentist’s office. He
did so because he misunderstood the phrase transcendental meditation, a form of
Buddhist prayer, for the phrase transcend dental medication. Tedious, a bit?
Brevity is the soul of wit, so only say what is needed to say, if that. In This is the End, after a series of petty
arguments, Jonah Hill prays to God to kill Jay Baruchel. Instead a demon comes
into Jonah’s room while he is sleeping. As the demon climbs up onto Jonah, he
scratches his arm with his hooves and leaves three marks. Jonah opens his eyes
and exclaims, “This isn’t a dream. This is real!”
Do you get the joke? Maybe, depending on whether you are already
informed as to what this scene is parodying. A parody like a pun is an
efficient joke. It conveys two meanings in the space of one, given of course
that the audience knows what the pun is referring two. In this case, you would
have had to see Roman Polanski’s 1968 classic horror movie “Rosemary’s Baby.”
The line “This isn’t a dream, this is real!” is uttered by Mia Farrow. Her
husband, in exchange for help in his career, has drugged his wife and
essentially sold her to a coven of witches so they can have a host for the
spawn of the devil. The drugs wear off just as the devil is climbing on top of
her, scratching her arms with his hooves. (By the way, this is the last movie
you should ever show to your pregnant wife.) Parodies are a derivative form of
joke, and like puns, they can sometimes elicit groans as being way too obvious,
like for instance, TV shows that parody Star Wars or The Godfather ad
infinitum. An efficient joke told too many times loses its efficiency. This was
the first time anybody parodied “Rosemary’s Baby” and so I thought it was funny
(not to mention the obscure reference massaged my film buff ego). Of course,
now that I’ve explained it to you, you probably won’t find it funny, but hey,
that’s just the way efficient jokes work!
A Joke of Misdirection, Freud says, is the art of bringing up a
not-funny topic as a mere distraction for something else far more benign. A
not-funny topic, let’s say rape, instills in the listener a sense of danger. So
they put up mental defenses in order to deal with this topic. But the joke is
not about this not-funny topic. It is entirely about something else. As the
listener comes to this realization it brings down its mental defenses, causing
psychic relief with the side effect of laughter. One of the best examples is
the Black Knight fight in “Monty Python’s Search for the Holy Grail.” King
Arthur is having a duel with the Black Knight in order to cross a bridge and
succeeds in chopping off the Black Knight’s arm. But the fight does not stop
here. The Black Knight seemingly in no pain at all insists that they continue.
“But I cut your bleeding arm off!” The king says. “No, you didn’t” contradicts
the Black Knight. “Yes I did!” the king insists pointing to the Black Knight’s
lack of arm. The Black Knight pauses and then remarks “Tis’ but a flesh wound.
Now, have at it.” The end of the skit has the King finally acquiescing to a
draw after he chops off all the remaining limbs and the Black Knight still
won’t admit defeat.
We have been presented with something rather serious, dismemberment (and
probably death), which has been subsequently misdirected into something
harmless and absurd, petty bickering as to whether the duel is over or not and
who is winning it. Generally the more serious the topic is the funnier the joke
can be if and only if the
misdirection is successfully pulled off.
The misdirection rape joke in This
is the End works like this. After three days of hanging out in James Franco
while the apocalypse rages outside, the six men are treated to an unexpected
guest in the form of Emma Watson. For those who live in caves, Emma Watson
played Hermoine in the last eight Harry
Potter movies and is widely considered to be especially beautiful. She has
been hiding in a drainage pipe for the last 72 hours. She is dirty. She is
tired. And she has nowhere else to turn. James Franco immediately offers his
bedroom for her to stay in. She takes this offer, heads upstairs, and the six
guys have a conversation. Jay Baruchel starts it. He relates to the guys the
importance of making Emma Watson feel comfortable given the obvious situation.
The other guys agree and promise not to overburden her with questions about
working on the Harry Potter movies. She probably gets a lot of that and it is
probably really annoying by now. No, Jay says, the other situation. You know the apocalypse outside and the
disappearance of all lawful society and the fact that she is the only female in
a house with six guys. We want to make her feel comfortable and not put out the
wrong vibe, he implores. “What vibe?” the group asks. “What are you talking
about, Jay?” Jay, ever the shy nice guy, feels reluctant to actually say the
words. So Danny McBride pipes in, “I think what Jay means is a ‘rapey vibe.”
The group becomes indignant and insulted. Nobody was at all considering raping
Hermoine. And then the conversation devolves into some petty bickering as to
who exactly Jay was specifically worried about so much that he felt the need to
bring up the rape topic. They point
fingers and accuse each other until McBride suggests that Jay isn’t worried
about Emma at all and instead brought up the topic because he is afraid of soon
becoming the house bitch himself. Emma for her part is in the bedroom only
hearing enough of the conversation to pick out the word ‘rape’ a bunch of times.
So she accosts the group with a fire axe, steals all of their water, and leaves
the mansion.
This is one of the best jokes in the movie and perhaps you can see the
misdirection. The subject of Emma Watson being gang-raped is brought into the
audience’s consciousness. It is a very serious thing and the psychic defenses
to go up in order to deal with such a situation. But soon enough it becomes
clear that she is not in any danger. Nobody in the house is thinking rape but
the nicest shyest guy who brings the topic for the sole purpose of protecting
her. Finally the joke ends on a suggestion that even Jay does not think it is
likely and is only acting out of a selfish desire to protect his own self. At
this point the misdirection is so complete it actually becomes unnecessary for
Emma to vividly demonstrate her ability to defend herself, but why not show it
anyway. She whacks Seth Rogen in the face with the axe but. And then she leaves
the movie entirely. So don’t worry. There is no way she is going to get raped
and nobody is suggesting that it should happen. Relax.
A Joke of Hostility, Freud says, is the only type of joke that does not
particularly need any cleverness. It is an insult that gives pleasure. The idea
is thus: You are a human being with instinctual desires to do anything and
everything you want whenever you want to do it. Society sets up rule saying you
cannot whatever you want. An insult directed at these boundaries and the
people/institutions that set them up is pleasurable. What are the usual
culprits here? Politics, Religion, Sex. Not coincidentally, those topics are
the holy triumvirate of Comedy. What needs to be understood when someone
critiques these kinds of jokes is that they are literally funny even if they
are absolutely offensive. Let’s say you are in grade school minding your own
business on the playground and a group of kids comes over, steals your ball,
and beats you up. Is that funny? Well, you probably wouldn’t think so, but
listen to all the laughter. How can you say it isn’t? Laughter is objective
proof that something somewhere is funny. Let’s take a much more public example:
comedian Seth MacFarlane’s hosting of the 2013 Oscar telecast, in particular we
can discuss a highly derided musical number he did with the inexplicably named
Gay Men’s Choir of Tuscon titled “We got to see your boobs!” In this song he
insulted every actress in the audience who had ever appeared nude in a movie
regardless of context. It is a particularly dramatic insult. He is taking the
work of an actress and completely disregarding anything and everything and
saying that is the only part that matters is the boobs. To make it more
dramatic, he does not make the joke as he is masturbating to Mr. Skin in the
privacy of his home. He is doing this to a captive audience of actresses in the
room in front of a billion people watching TV. Boy, did Charlize Theron look
humiliated. I’m sure Seth MacFarlane thought the whole thing was hilarious. He
must have because it takes months to plan and practice an Oscar Telecast and he
had a team of writers working with him. They must have had long conversations
over long tables about how funny it was. The joke bombed terribly at the Oscar
show and the main reason is that for the joke to work the audience would have
to hate women. The audience in the building is at least half women and men that
work closely with them. The audience watching around the world is primarily
women; the Oscar telecast being not only about movies but a huge night for
fashion. (The Female Super Bowl it is consistently referred to.) Surely I have
never witnessed such a colossal comedic miscalculation on such a grand scale
before, but why it happened can nevertheless be explained. Seth thought it was
funny and to him it was because he is a total douchebag who hates women. Freud
blames this on sexual frustration. He vould say that Seth believes, probably
correctly, that none of the actresses in the audience would ever sleep with him
and so he is out for revenge. Anyway, the epilogue to this story is that the producers
who hired Seth have been hired again for next year. The show got very good
ratings although it probably was not because the show was any good (it wasn’t)
but because it had been the rare year when many of the movies nominated had
been very popular with mass audiences. I guess the people at the Academy that
hire the producers want to be irrefutably proved wrong before changing
anything.
Now how about that hostile rape joke in This is the End. It comes near the end. Danny McBride had been
earlier thrown out of the house for wasting water and masturbating on James
Franco’s last porno mag. After a bunch of other stuff that I won’t give away
happens, James Franco, Seth Rogen, and Jay Baruchel find themselves outside the
house running away from demons as well.
And at that point they run into apocalyptic gang of rapists/cannibals
led by none other than Danny McBride who plans on….you guessed it…raping and
eating his old friends. To prove he has turned this evil within say 24 hours he
brings out his sex slave who he has already sodomized several times. And making
a neat celebrity cameo is Channing Tatum.
There are a few things that make this not so not funny. One, Channing is
a very strong man. Second, he has consented to being in this movie. Third, it is kind of surprising to see
him here at all. But the joke really is not all that funny. It is not clever in
an efficient way and surely isn’t misdirection. According to McBride he has
already been raped several times. So to find it funny you would have to not
like Channing Tatum or perhaps just not like celebrities. There is a repeated
hostile joke in this movie involving celebrities dying horrific deaths. These
like the rape joke are counting on the audience to have some sort of hostility
towards the idea of celebrity in and of itself. This I do not share, most
likely because I generally do not watch bad movies. I hear Channing has been in
a couple stinkers (GI Joe) but as I
have yet to see them, I do not share the hostility. So for me this particular
joke was not all that funny.
But you may say, “Hey Max, I don’t hate anybody. I would never find
hostile jokes to be funny.” Ha, ha, ha, of course you hate people. Everybody
hates somebody. But I understand where you are coming from: you aren’t or at
least do not want to be a total douchebag like Seth MacFarlane. So the question
is how can one laugh at hostile jokes without being a total douchebag? It is a
question of not what is funny but what is polite social behavior and I may as
well name the rule after myself because I’m making it up right now.
Max’s Rule of Hostile yet Polite Jokes: The polite amount of laughter
one may derive from a hostile joke must be directly proportional to the power
of the subject being attacked. So making hostile jokes directed at children,
the homeless, the disabled, oppressed minorities, illegal immigrants, and the
like are not politely funny. Jokes directed at prime ministers, presidents,
corporate CEOs, school principals, are politely funny. It should be noted that
any of the above powerless categories could become politely funny if given
power. For instance, it is not polite to make fun of someone’s blindness, but
if a blind man becomes the Governor of New York it totally polite to make fun
of his blindness. If you have never seen SNL’s lampooning of the blind
ex-Governor David Patterson, believe me it is very funny.
Let’s wrap this up: Can a hostile rape joke directed at a woman ever be
politely funny. There is potential for it of course, but it depends on a
directly proportional amount of glass ceilings being broken it would have to be
directed at a particular woman and not just the gender. I cannot think of a
more hostile joke than a rape joke. Even death is not nearly so hostile. I do
not know how many rape jokes were directed at Maggie Thatcher, but I do know
there is a big musical number in the play “Billy Elliot” that is all about
wishing her a swift death. On the day of her death, the current Broadway
Production asked its audience as to whether it wanted to keep the song. The
audience voted to keep it in. Was that misogynistic? Of course not. Maggie
Thatcher was the prime minister of England. She was making policy choices that
directly affected the lives of millions of people. She had power. Contrast that
with Charlize Theron being forced to sit silently through Seth MacFarlane’s
crassness and you have a clear example of how power affects the politeness of a
hostile joke. It also matters if the powerful person is a terrible person. For
instance, hostile rape jokes directed at Hitler are always polite.
No comments:
Post a Comment