I’ve been reading a lot of old books by old people and some new books
about old people lately. Old like anything before the 20th century
old. It is a bit stunning how they articulate interpersonal relationships. Take
for instance an ordinary letter between family members or between lovers. They
are unabashedly incredibly romantic in language and verse. Move a little bit
closer to the present day and consider a run of the mill rock and roll song
from the 1950s and 1960s. They surely were not as serious as 19th
century letters but the musicians really seemed to like the person the song was
about. Nowadays songs are more than likely to resemble some sort of revenge
straight from the fallout of a bad breakup or yet another skirmish in an
ongoing bad romance directed more toward a mass audience counting points than
to the other person involved. We’ve lost something that much is for sure.
There’s probably plenty of blame to go around. For my money, I think the
main difference is the far less present specter of death. Back then, people
dropped like flies all the time with an astounding amount of women and children
kicking the bucket from childbirth complications. Just dead people and babies
everywhere. I think that’s why way they took relationships with the still
living so seriously.
Compare that with today, and Joseph Gordon-Levitt’s writing/directing
debut “Don Jon’s Addiction” is a good example, where it seems that people
convinced of their ability to live long lives without any true drama are trying
their best to take themselves and others as unserious as possible. This movie
is now called “Don Jon” instead of the previous title “Don Jon’s Addiction”
ever since the marketers got their grubby hands on it. But “Don Jon’s Addiction”
is a better title. It makes it clear that this is not the raping/murdering evil
lothario we’ve seen before in operas and plays. This is a modern Don Jon that
unabashedly takes part in a far more benign promiscuous practice. This Don Jon
likes pornography. He likes it a lot.
Don Jon is played by the writer/director himself, Joseph Gordon-Levitt,
in a part that is very much against type. JGL over an already long career has
proven himself adept at playing smart and cool customers (Brick, Inception, Looper). Don Jon is anything but that. The first
thing you will notice is that JGL spent a bit of time in the gym for this one.
He has especially bulked up around the shoulders to pull off the look of one of
that guy in the club who spends his time with his buddies rating women 1-10 (a
ten being a ‘dime’) and cultivating a streak of a different woman every week.
Don Jon is especially adept at doing this. He looks good, has a nice pad, but
most importantly acts like a complete buffoon. That last one because it is the
main ingredient. One-night stands are hard things to pull off when the other
person takes you seriously. JGL, the writer, seems to really get this and the
movie is strongest when he pits his character up against a ‘dime’ played by
Scarlett Johansson. Both are smart
people but as this is a modern relationship, the conversations consist of them
taking turns trying to out stupid the other. The first date is especially a
delight as it is a clever exercise in unassuming immaturity.
But do not let the characters fool you into thinking the movie itself is
lightweight. “Don Jon’s Addiction,” is a movie of ideas even if its characters
are not all that articulate. JGL has actual things to say about the unrealistic
expectations of modern men that watch too much porn and of modern women who
watch touch-feely romantic comedies, i.e. Scarlett Johansson, a grown woman,
has a poster of “Titanic” in her room. It is to JGL’s credit not only that he
took on an admittedly edgy subject but also that he does it in a reasonably
well fashion. I had not seen this particular fight between a couple before and
was not annoyed by it one bit. In this movie, I was impressed by that much.
Having said that, this is not a perfect movie, for as well as JGL
captures the immaturity of modern romance, when he pivots the story towards a
mature relationship with a woman, played by Julianne Moore, that Don Jon meets
at night school the footing is far less sure. What was certainty in behavior
turns to guesses. They are good guesses at least. For instance, the Julianne
Moore character is a widow. So death will make a romance more serious, but can
JGL explain why, or has he simply watched enough movies to know that the most
sympathetic characters in screenwriting are widows.
More suspect is his decision to have Don Jon come from a blue collar
Italian family. These scenes, involving none other than Tony Danza as a cursing
football watching ball buster of a father who likes to eat spaghetti dinners in
a wife beater, are played for comic relief at best. As before the inspiration
seems to come less from real life than from movies that feature blue-collar
Italian families. I’m thinking less “The Sopranos” and more “Saturday Night
Fever.” I don’t think JGL is Italian. Of course, I don’t have a blue collar Italian
family but I can say this at least; he got the Catholic Church wrong. Don Jon
goes to church and confession every single week and yet at the end of the movie
there is a joke with a punch line consisting of the character not knowing the
local priest’s name on the other side of the screen. That’s simply not
believable. It is the type of joke that would only be funny if you were not
acquainted with the subject matter.
But over all, this is a good movie with enough laughs to sustain an
enjoyable experience and enough technical proficiency and creativity to make
the movie buff interested in what JGL could accomplish next. He was a bit
uneven at times and swung for the fences a few more times than was necessary
but I see plenty of potential. Anyway, it was his first time.
No comments:
Post a Comment