At least once a year I feel the need to point out the moral ambituity of
large-scale action sequences in modern blockbusters, specifically the untold
and unfelt thousands of deaths that necessarily must occur when entire cities
are reduced to rubble. I had been crying in the wilderness to nobody in
parituclar about this for so long that I expected that I would continue to do
it indefinitely. Imagine my pleasant surprise then when Marvel’s new movie,
“Captain America: Civil War” not only admits the reality of human collateral
damage but makes it the focal conflict for the entire story.
It starts with a covert operation in an African country by Captain
America, Black Widow, Hawk, and Scarlett Witch (new to me but apparently
introduced before). A bad guy is trying to steal a biological weapon. The fight
starts in a parking lot moves to an office building and finally ends in a
crowded marketplace. The bad guy has a suicide bomb in which he means to kill
everybody. Scarlett Witch, whose mutant power is to telekinesis, moves the bomb
explosion from the marketplace to the air but miscalculates and ends up killing
about fifteen people in an office building. The Avengers given that they are
conducting vigilante military operations are held suspect for this outcome. A
proposal is passed to give the United Nations oversight over the Avengers.
Iron Man, aka Tony Stark, feels guilty enough for this occurrence (The
fifteen dead were charity workers although any fifteen dead people would have
been good enough for me) to support the resolution. Captain America, coming out
against democracy, believes that the resolution would stop him from taking
action for or against whatever he deems himself to be important. It may be
obvious whose side I am taking in this conflict. I’m with Iron Man all the way.
Captain America apparently thinks he knows better than entire democratic
societies. That is the sort of behavior that gives Freedom a bad name.
The amount of characters and superheroes already introduced in this
umpteenth of Marvel movies makes listing all of them and the actors playing
them time prohibitive, but they line up in equal numbers on each side.
Thankfully Thor and The Hulk are somewhere else, as their presence would
seriously tip the scale against the more destructible members of the Avengers.
The action sequences are better and more entertaining than previous Marvel
movies. This is because instead of relying on the spectactles getting bigger
and more explosive, the superheroes fight themselves (and thus aren’t nameless
pushovers) and thus humor and creativity have to be employed to make sure
nobody gets embarrassed. The abandoned airport fight is especially good. Also,
as I said before, no massive human collateral occurs. The result is a very
enjoyable movie and my favorite Marvel movie so far.
Joining the Marvel universe for the first time is SpiderMan (the other
two Sony franchises have not happened in this particular franchise) and Black
Panther. Now this is a good opportunity for a compare and contrast between what
is considered to be one of the most beloved characters of Marvel and what is
sure to be the most boring.
Spiderman, aka Peter Parker, is a dorky teenager who lives with his Aunt
May in Queens, New York. Black Panther is the handsome well-mannered prince of
the aforementioned African nation. When Stan Lee created Spiderman, his stated
intention was to give the character all the regular flaws a teenager generally
has like immaturity, acne, and a hopeless crush on a girl. Such honesty and
relatability became endearing pushing Spiderman to an upper echelons of popular
superheroes. Black Panther, in contrast, seems to be a corporate marketing
committee’s response to an outcry for political correctness. He stands in like Two-fer
in “30 Rock” as proof that the corporation believes black people can be noble,
properly educated, and not sidekicks. It is perhaps a good thing that the
effort was made but the fact that they went about it in a way that crossed all
the t’s and dotted all the i’s goes a long way in making the character
generally unrelatable and almost as important, boring. He has no flaws and by
the end of the movie his one conflict is resolved. I can’t imagine what will
happen in the next movie that will allow the character to learn and grow in
complexity. Perhaps he will join Thor battling interstellar ice monsters. Peter Parker as we all know has a long journey ahead of him since
not incidentally he starts from a far humbler beginning.
(I doubt anyone else has noted this but the term ‘black panther’ refers
to the militant wing of an oppressed poor minority group. Is it not culturally
insensitive for a wealthy member of a ruling majority class to appropriate the
moniker? Or does this not count because they are both black.)
But enough about this. I really liked the movie and would recommend it
to anyone interested in seeing a blockbuster. The humor, the action, and most
importantly the maturity set it apart from most others. Finally I have added
the original Captain America movie to my DVD queue. For the first time I have
wanted to see it and fill in that particular gap in my Marvel movie knowledge.
Hi Max, I do so agree with you on how each of the past Marvel (and current unwarranted violence in X-MEN) movies have brought unacceptable unresolved violent acts of torment on the innocent citizenry of every country. This particular movie really did address that in a particularly sensitive manner so I agree with your logic and discussion. GO, MAX! Within the story, I loved how the other Marvel characters were put in prison to 'suffer' for digressions in that respect. Personally, I was happy that Captain America did not join up with the bureaucratic flow because it was so flawed; the world would have been destroyed if all had agreed to the bureaucracy according to the story, right? Today, I read that the writers of the continuing Marvel Captain America comic book saga have identified him as an agent of Hydra and that he has had that identification from his early days. It makes an interesting twist to the story. I am glad the movie ended without me knowing that emerging fact as I enjoyed the thoughtful demonstration of the character's thinking about the human condition.
ReplyDelete"the world would have been destroyed if all had agreed to the bureaucracy according to the story"
ReplyDeleteThe bureaucracy in this case is representative government. I would argue that it is worth the danger to preserve. Captain America acts like a tyrant, albeit the world's most polite one. If he doesn't like the bureaucracy, he should try voting in the next election or perhaps running for office himself. Admittedly that would be a far less thrilling movie, but just because something is boring doesn't mean it is not right.
Thanks for the comment! Your my biggest fan!
p.s. I looked up Black Panther and apparently the comic book hero preceded the militant group so Marvel isn't misappropriating anything. My bad. I don't read comic books.