Politically Correct Psycho Killer
Paul Schrader, screenwriter of
Taxi Driver, once stated in an oral history of the movie:
“I had written the character of
the pimp [that Harvel Keitel plays] as black, and we were told by Colombia we
had to change it to a white guy because the lawyers were concerned “if we do
this and Travis kills all those black people at the end, then we’re going to
have a riot. And we’re going to be liable for this.”
Imagine for a moment that Taxi
Driver had not cast Harvey Keitel as the pimp. That the movie instead had
cast a black man and that Travis Bickle ends the movie by murdering that black
man to save the thirteen-year-old prostitute played by Jodie Foster. Such a
scenario would make sense for Travis Bickle’s character. He is a racist. That
isn’t the end all be all of his personality, but it is there. He has a great
disgust for the city he is living in (1970s New York) and black people are
clearly a part of his disgust. If this detail were more overt, would anyone
have had the guts to think of Taxi Driver as a great movie? Or would it
have been completely overwhelmed by the political reaction? If Scorsese had
made the decision to stick with the original plan in casting, would that have
been an act of racism? Is it itself racist to make a good movie about a racist?
This kind of question is relevant
now given the several controversies over the movie Joker, wherein the
creators have been accused of providing a platform for incels and other kinds
of gloomy white men to expound their hatred. Little do these critics know that
they have already won the war. (Most have only seen the trailer). Joker
preemptively self-censored itself. This gloomy white man named Arthur Fleck,
played by Joaquin Phoenix, only targets rich white men and ends up creating a
protest movement against income inequality. Now, who could argue about that?
There is a strange disconnect in
the setting of this movie. Everything looks like it takes place in the “bad old
days” of New York. It is painted in the bad fashion, subway graffiti, and super
rats of inner-city decay. There is even a very important scene that initiates Arthur
Fleck on his journey to become the nihilistic arch-villain of Gotham. He is jumped
on the subway, pulls a gun, and kills the men who attacked him. Does this
remind you of anyone? Clearly, it is Bernie Goetz, the subway killer, reborn in
movie form. In the early 1980s, this man shot four would-be muggers in a city
subway and was lionized by a large section of the city who were also sick of
getting mugged. Of course, the difference between Goetz and Arthur Fleck is
that Goetz shot four black teenagers. Here, Arthur Fleck kills three drunk
white wall street assholes.
I’m making a big deal about this
because of what Joker is supposed to be: a gritty
realistic origin story of a villain. It would make sense if the audience didn’t
approve of the man’s motives and it would have made the movie far more
weighty and interesting if the motives matched the environment being evoked. But it seems
that the movie’s creators were too scared to make the character controversial
out of concerns that certain critics wouldn’t be able to tell the difference
between the point of view of movie makers and characters within a movie.
In effect, we have a movie that wants to instill a mood akin to great 1970s movies but lacks the emotional depth
to actually do so. It’s like a player piano. It hits all the correct notes, but
has no feeling. You won’t walk out of it unnerved like the way you felt when
you watched Taxi Driver. It probably will make far more money though.
Joker contains a very good
performance by Joaquin Phoenix, great production design, and an evocative score.
It was directed by Todd Phillips, best known for comedies like Old School and
The Hangover who shows that he can at least play the right notes in a drama.
If anything, it is much better than all the recent D.C. comic fare. They ought
to make more movies like this one, more character based and less effects
driven. I only wish, well, that it wasn’t a comic book movie. That would be more
interesting.
No comments:
Post a Comment