Once upon a time there were two
families, one rich and one poor. The rich lived at the top of the hill. At the
bottom lived the poor. “Parasite” is the latest effort from writer/director
Bong Joon Ho (“The Host”, “Okja”). Its scope is specific, it concerns itself
with two families in Seoul, South Korea, one rich and one poor and takes place
almost entirely within two homes. Its effect is broad. I expect families all
over the world regardless of location or language would immediately understand the
themes. Like most great cinema, “Parasite” finds in the details a larger universal
truth. No wonder this Korean film won the Palme D’or a Cannes and has grossed
over $100 million outside South Korea. I think this movie has the better chance
at a Best Picture Oscar than any other foreign language film I have ever seen.
The poor family’s name is Kim. The
patriarch is played by Kang-ho Song, the only actor I recognized. The parents
are unemployed and the family earns the rent for his basement apartment by taking
on gig jobs like folding pizza boxes. One day, the son is presented with an
opportunity to be recommended as a English language tutor for daughter of the Park
family, the rich family at the top of the hill. The son asks the school friend
that wants to recommend him for the job: “Why pick a loser like me?” The school
friend explains that he has a crush on the rich daughter and does not want to
recommend a tutor that the daughter would ever consider. The poor son takes no offense.
He know he is poor.
Deceit is required to be hired.
Educational degrees are forged. The rich mother (played here by Yea-Jeong Jo)
is particularly gullible and says things that make the poor son believe she
could be further deceived. Step by step the Kims insert themselves into employment
in the Park household. The poor daughter becomes the art therapist for the rich
son. The poor father becomes the chauffeur of the rich father. The poor mother
becomes the full-time maid. The Parks are not exactly being taken advantage.
The Kims are totally competent and do their jobs well. The people that suffer
are the other employees the Kims succeed in defaming and having terminated. The
Parks are more unaware than anything. The Kims are
Now we are at the midpoint of the
movie. The Parks leave town for a camping trip. In the night, the old housekeeper
comes back claiming she has forgotten something in the basement. At this point,
the movie twists in a weird, suspenseful, and supremely satisfying way that all
marketing have deftly avoided spoiling. I too would not dream of saying anymore
about the plot and from here on out will only wax philosophical.
In one scene, the Kims are
discussing the Parks. The poor son says, “They are rich, but nice.” The mother
disagrees: “The are nice because they are rich. If I were rich, I would be
soooo nice.”
And why wouldn’t the Parks be nice
people? They are secure and comfortable and are treated nicely by everyone they
meet. One would be tempted to conclude that it is the poor Kims that are treating
the rich Parks poorly. But then an unexpected tragedy occurs, and the rich
Parks, in particular the naïve rich mother, perform an act so extraordinarily
insensitive that it approaches cruelty, except of course, that the Parks have
no idea that they are acting cruelly because the Kims have been so thoroughly
dishonest. Mayhem follows and the movie resolves itself in such an unexpected
symmetry that the story elevates itself into the realm of timeless parable.
What is the responsibility of the Parks
to know what is going on around them? How much fault do the Kims have for their
part in sheltering the Parks. I was reminded by the chapter in Ralph Ellison’s “Invisible
Man” where the protagonist, a black student at a black college in the south,
accidentally chauffeurs a white trustee of the college to the wrong side of
town. The white trustee is appalled by the poverty, seemingly seeing it for the
first time. Back at the college, the black college president expels the student
for showing the white trustee the poor conditions of the community. As the
black college president explains, his power over the protagonist comes from his
efforts to make the whites feel good about themselves and he does this by keeping
from them societal truths. That is not so different from the story of the Kims
and Parks. The rich live in bliss on the clouds. Down below the starving poor
eat each other.
You picked an international movie to be the movie of the year last December, two months before the academy awards! Way to go. Congratulations....
ReplyDelete