Search This Blog

Showing posts with label j.c. chandor. Show all posts
Showing posts with label j.c. chandor. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 17, 2015

A Most Violent Year (4/5 Stars)





“I have always taken the most right path”
- Abel Morales

The fate of this movie may be a prime example of the whims of zeitgeist. Just like it sometimes feels a mega hit comes out of nowhere (see “American Sniper”), so can a strong well made movie go nowhere for no particular reason. Writer/Director J.C. Chandor’s third feature “A Most Violent Year” did not make much money or garner a high number of award nominations (strikingly The National Board of Review made it their movie of the year though it should be noted that this designation happened before everyone else, including the Oscars, completely ignored the film). Perhaps though this movie should not yet be written to the dust heap. I have a feeling that the maker is so strong that we might be discovering this ‘lost’ movie ten-twenty years from now. It is further proof that Chandor is as versatile as he is competent. His first movie was ‘Margin Call’ an intricately detailed and highly expository view of high finance on the day of a stock market meltdown. His second movie was the exact opposite. He ditched all the words and wrote a nearly silent movie about one old man at sea named “All is Lost.” This time he switches direction again with a period piece about a heating oil business under attack by rising crime in 1981. It looks and feels entirely different from his first two movies except for the invisible sure hand of the director behind it. Sometimes when you see a movie you can just sense the controlled confidence of a Director with a capital ‘D.’ Alfred Hitchcock movies have this feeling. So do Stanley Kubrick and Christopher Nolan movies. The movies of young J.C. Chandor have this feeling as well.

The story concerns an immigrant Abel Morales (Oscar Isaac) and his wife Anna Morales (Jessica Chastain). Abel is on the verge of expanding his business greatly by buying a refinery for his heating oil business. He has just given a down payment of $40,000 and expects to close the deal with bank financing at the end of the month. At the same time somebody has been hijacking his trucks and selling his oil at a discounted rate to one of his competitors. At the same time the district attorney (David Oyelowo) has started an investigation into his company for complying with the standard industry practices which were generally fraudulent. His wife, who has mob connections, does the books for his company. His lawyer is played by Albert Brooks who has completed the transformation from a young neurotic comedian to an old steely dramatic actor. The man is a heavy now and fits in great with the last great character of this movie, the brooding emptied out noir scape of 1980s New York City. I did not live in NYC during this time but I’ve seen the movies that were made in the early 1980s. One in particular, Escape From New York, imagined a future where the island of Manhattan was transformed into a high security prison populated entirely by criminals. People were not very optimistic back then and you can feel it in this movie.

There is violence in “A Most Violent Year,” but it is portrayed in a way that is almost never seen in movies. Whereas an action movie generally has highly stylized set pieces that ignore many real world implications this movie dives right into the nitty gritty of real life. Take these plot points. There is a discussion as to whether the drivers in the heating oil trucks should be carrying firearms. This is a concern because if a driver shoots a gun on a crowded highway, whether in self-defense or not, it has huge legal ramifications for the company. And if the legal inquiries happen that may scare off the financing from the bank that is central to the real estate deal. I wish action movies would take a look at how J.C. Chandor has made this movie because the violence that takes place albeit with fewer explosions has far more weight and suspense ingrained in it. There is even a car chase in this movie, which simply does not feel like a regular car chase scene. It feels dangerous. For example, if they were to plow into a street cart of fruit (which does not happen but does happen in every other movie with a car chase) you can bet that the owner of said fruitcart would have a major part in the movie. 

The look of the movie is where J.C. Chandor is being his most innovative in this movie. “A Most Violent Year” follows the great cinematic tradition of period pieces that present the world of the past through the film stock of those years. If you are ever wondering why so many movies that take place pre 1960s are black and white or have at least some of the color drained out of them, well we remember those decades that way because all the movies were black and white. This is the same with the graininess of the 1970s. And here, the advent of videotape with its over saturated reds and browns gives “A Most Violent Year” its warm 1980s look. Certainly walking down the street in 1981 did not look like we see it in this movie but we remember it that way because that’s how we recorded it back then. Oh and my favorite set piece is the NYC subway completely overwritten with angry graffiti. That more than anything represents what is known as the Bad Old Days.

The acting is great. Jessica Chastain as always fits in perfectly with whatever she is doing. Oscar Isaac has the keen ability to look like someone who no longer walks around the modern world. In fact, in one of his first major roles he played a Roman Centurion (“Agora”). That sounds about right. I want to see him in a movie where he plays the antagonist in some ancient battle against Russell Crowe. It think he will do a very good job in his next movie that takes place a long long time ago in a galaxy far far away.

Oh and I was a fan of the Jews, those Orthodox Jews that inhabit South Williamsburg. Those are the guys that Abel does the real estate deal with. I used to do real estate deals with those guys too. You can just tell that anything that happens in NYC from the best to the worst, those guys are going to be relatively unaffected by it. They have their own culture and they have it for the long haul. 


Thursday, October 31, 2013

All is Lost (3/5 Stars)





Old Man Redford and the Sea

Talk about doing something completely different. Writer/Director J.C. Chandor’s last movie (and also his first feature) was Margin Call, a movie whose brilliance shown through how efficiently and succinctly an absolute ton of exposition could be told almost entirely through dialogue. That movie took place during one climatic night at a big bank where all the different players came together and decided to rip off all their clients and business associates in order to save their own hides. By the end you knew who everyone was, what their function at the bank was, where they came from, and quite a bit about the secondary market of residential home mortgage loans. At the same time, the plot never stalled and the suspense of the main storyline never abated. It was a true achievement in writing netting Chandor his first Oscar Nomination for Original Screenplay.

Contrast that with All is Lost, which has only one character who doesn’t speak at all, unless you count SOS calls, mumbled grunts, and one loud frustrated epithet. Robert Redford plays the man and from now on I will refer to the man as Old Man Redford because the movie does not bother to give him a name. Casting is almost everything in a movie such as this because the writer, at least as a master of dialogue, has essentially written himself out of the story and given the task of making sure what needs to be conveyed is conveyed by the actor. And here Old Man Redford steps up very well with such precision in facial expressions and physical movements that at times it can seem that you are reading Old Man Redford’s mind. One thing that this movie has in common with Margin Call is how effectively information is conveyed (even though it is conveyed in completely opposite ways). It is the sort of display that garners tremendous confidence in the storytelling skills of the director. I look forward to anything Chandor does in the future.

I can’t give anyway any of the plot because so much of the movie is simply procedural storytelling. What you can know is that a shipping container rams into Old Man Redford’s sailboat in the middle of the night causing a big hole in the side and ruining his radio and phone. The rest of the movie he deals with this problem. Given that the enjoyment of the movie comes from witnessing how he deals with it, this will be a rather short vague review. What can be said though is that Old Man Redford, currently 77 years old, should be the talk of all his AARP meetings.

A lot of people are giving Oscar talk for Redford, which may or may not be warranted. I say he’s on the line here. This is the type of performance that I think can be fairly argued is one of those that garners praise because it happened at all, not because it was a great performance. It’s the age that makes it impressive. Old Man Redford is really old. He should not be out in the middle of the Indian Ocean dealing with storm surges. I wonder if anyone on the set was concerned for his mortality during the shooting of the movie. Is that a fair thing to judge a performance on? I mean if a middle-aged actor put on a bunch of old man makeup for the same role and got everything correct, would we think it was just a good of a performance? Or are we giving Old Man Redford more credit because what he is doing is more than ordinary for someone his age.  

There is one other thing that is stopping this very good but small movie from being great and that is competition. Specifically Gravity and Captain Phillips, two very good movies with very much the same themes that came out in the same month. I expect All is Lost to be overshadowed a bit by those two. It should be. The other movies are better.