Good luck trying to brainwash a crazy person.
Suppose you were a charlatan, somebody who falsely claims to have
special skills or expertise. Now suppose you were a very ambitious charlatan,
not just an ordinary con man peddling nonexistent charity or selling used cars as new, but someone who with the gall to claim access to the
divine. Let’s go even further now and head into L. Ron Hubbard territory. Suppose you had the chutzpah to start your own religion and suppose you had the personality
and intelligence to actually pull it off on a grand scale. We have gotten this far so we must assume that one of two things is true. One: you are correct about the secrets of the universe. Or two: You’ve got to be some sort of
megalomaniacal psychotic sociopath.
This is an important thing to keep in mind as one watches “The Master,”
mainly because the sociopath in question, Lancaster Dodd played by Phillip
Seymour Hoffman in another brilliant characterization, is such a nice,
friendly, and warm fellow. He likes singing. He likes dancing and he loves giving
speeches. It is easy to forget that he spends the vast majority of his day lying, cheating, and stealing
from those who follow him. Lancaster Dodd, modeled after the founder of
Scientology L. Ron Hubbard, is an evil person. His entire demeanor is a
well-rehearsed act played to disarm the senses, gain trust, and to ultimately
control his followers. I believe the common term is brainwashing, although how Dodd works is more like hypnosis (don’t tell him that!). The to remember about someone under hypnosis is not that they do not know the truth. They just don’t care. They have intentionally submitted themselves
to a fantasy.
In that view it does not actually matter what is the fantasy. A cursory
study of the beliefs of Scientology reveal an absolutely ridiculous plethora of
science fiction looniness. It boggles the rational mind. Given that Hubbard was
not insane, why would he base a religion on something so unbelievable? Think
about it this way: What if the ridiculousness of it all was simply a byproduct
of an enormous ego. Perhaps the next step in self-glorification from creating a
religion that men will follow blindly, is creating an absolutely absurd
religion that men will follow blindly. The absurdity grotesquely emphasizes the
personal magnetism of the leader. If the Pope can get priests and nuns to give
up family and sex for a life of service to God, if Napoleon could get men to
die for ribbons and medals and country, what does it say about Hubbard if he
can get bank accounts for thetans and other like rubbish? Perhaps that is what makes
him truly a Master of men.
The religion in this movie does not actually encompass any of the tenets
of “Scientology.” It doesn’t need to; the actual belief system is arbitrary in
front of the central conflict between the master's cult of personality and his would-be followers. In
particular, one relationship between Dodd and ex-Navy man Freddie
Quell, played in erratic fashion by real life crazy man Joaquin Phoenix, is the
central driving force of the story.
Freddie Quell is an animal. Possibly suffering PTSD from his service in
WWII or simply just crazy, he is an aimless drifter with no friends, family, or
money. He starts fights with innocent bystanders, mixes death-defying cocktails
with intoxicants such as rocket fuel and paint thinner, and thinks sex in an uninhibited fashion. The man is a walking id. Lancaster Dodd has many bullshit reasons of
why he would seek the company of Freddie Quell as a protégé, plenty going under
the guise of “helping him.” What this relationship really amounts to however is a vanity project. Lancaster Dodd has successfully brainwashed old rich
ladies, several ex-wives, and a small legion of believers, and now he is aiming
for bigger game. He wants to be able to control a man who is uncontrollable.
Freddie Quell could be the Great White Whale for charlatans. Here is a man who will
not join the following for all the usual reasons. He has no family or friends in the
group. He does not seek influence over other people. He has no interest in making money
(unlike for instance the oilman submitting to a baptism in order to build his
pipeline in Paul Thomas Anderson’s last movie, “There Will Be Blood.”) And
lastly, he is certainly not affected by peer pressure in any conventional
sense. If Freddie Quell joins the following and stays put it will be because he truly
believes and that in turn glorifies the controlling power of the Master. Quell may be deranged but he has no lying in him, (which is perhaps
what makes him so deranged.)
Boy does Lancaster Dodd throw the book at Quell and gives the man everything
he has got. Every scene they have together is a mind-battle between two
heavyweights. Perhaps one of the best scenes involves a Dianetics inspired
interrogation where Dodd peppers Quell with a multitude of intensely private
questions. Notice how Dodd gains the upper hand. Mind control works like ju-jitsu. You can’t win by getting the other person to fight against himself.
Paul Thomas Anderson’s writing is on a level far above the average
movie. A character like Lancaster Dodd is so hard to pull off. Take a scene
that takes place in a high society party. Dodd is explaining how people have
had past lives and are repeatedly incarnated. When they go through “processing”
they can recall their past lives and gain insight into their present and future
lives. “Processing” can even solve certain types of Leukemia. A man at the
party intends to confront Dodd on this point. I think we can all agree that
“processing” cannot cure Leukemia and that professing such a belief is absurd
if not downright odious. Would it surprise you that Lancaster Dodd wins this
argument and wins it handily, leaving the man speechless and embarrassed? It is
not movie magic with unrealistic dialogue happening here. The time-travel man
wins the debate against the skeptic because he is such an intelligent speaker
that he is able to run logical circles around ordinary men on even the most absurd
of topics.
Combine that with another strange musical score from Jonny Greenwood
(who also did “There Will Be Blood”) and you have one of the most fiercely
original movies of the year. Here is to hoping it does not take Paul Thomas
Anderson another five years to make his next movie.
No comments:
Post a Comment