To call “Masterminds” a movie “based on a
true story,” streches that line about as far as it can go. Truth may have
provided the basic premise: in 1997 a man named David Ghannt, an employee of
the Loomis Fargo armored truck company, stole $17 million in cash from the warehouse
he worked at. Everything else seems entirely made up for laughs with a blatant
disregard as to whether the audience would believe it had actually happened. In
fact, the movie plays like they just assumed we wouldn’t care. It was funny so
I really didn’t care.
Take one scene foe example: After the
robbery, the plan is for David Ghannt (played by Zach Galifinakis) to
immediately run away to Mexico. To help his escape, he stuffs $20,000 in cash
into his underwear to the point where it noticeably bulges out in all
directions. Also he needs a disguise. So he is given a platinum blonde shoulder
length wig and yellow contacts with feline pupils. It’s pretty funny but I’m
quite certain the real David Ghannt didn’t try to get through airport security
in that manner.
The movie was directed by Jared Hess (Napolean Dynamite, Nacho Libre) and
arrives in theaters a year late due to the bankruptcy of its parent company. Its
delay has two main consequences. One is that it represents a too-late starring
vehicle for Zach Galifinakis whose star power has ebbed significantly from its
peak in the early 2010s. He hasn’t headlined a movie since 2013. On the other
hand, it catches on the upswing the growing star of Kaitlyn “Crazy Eyes”
McKinnon, who in a supporting part shows off her innate ability to be funny in
every frame shes in. A year ago, before Ghostbusters and Hillary Clinton’s
endless campaign (McKinnon plays Clinton on “Saturday Night Live”) my reaction
may have been “Who is she?” but now it is “Oh it’s her!”
The movie would have you believe David
Ghannt did the heist to win the love of Kelly Campbell, a former co-employee,
here played by Kristin Wiig. Who knows if that is true, but it certainly makes
Ghannt look more pathetic, a good move playing to the talent of Zach
Galifinakis. The brain behind the heist is a man named Steve Chambers (played
by Owen Wilson). Owen Wilson proves his stock utility as reliably affable.
Steve Chambers apparently had the brilliant idea to make Ghannt do all the hard
work, send him to Mexico, and then pay a hit man (played by Jason Sudeikis) to
kill Ghannt. That sounds like pretty dark stuff. Owen Wilson plays him like you
know it’s all really sad, but we got to do this, so let’s just get it over with
and remain friends with everyone who is still alive. Playing Chamber’s wife is
Mary Elizabeth Ellis (the waitress from “It’s Always Sunny in Philadelphia), an
actress adept at playing white trash and well suited to her role. She looks and
sounds ridiculous. One of the first things Chambers and her do upon receiving
their money is to get dental braces.
The only person miscast here is Jason Sudeikis.
His hit man is ridiculous. For instance, upon purchasing guns, he decides to go
for the 1700s musket that he has to pour gunpowder into. He’s that type of guy.
The problem is Sudeikis neither looks nor acts anything like anybody actually
tough. It’s too cartoonish and this character would have been better had
someone like Liam Neeson or Danny Trejo been cast.
The movie, like many movies, perhaps leans too much on spectacle. Zach
Galifinakis’ trip to Mexico is littered with many jokes that could be filed
under the ‘funny hat’ category. It’s never not funny but also not particularly
memorable either. And the climax of the story is too big to truly ground the
comedy. The Chambers family in an act of profound stupidity, that is never
truly mined for its great potential, throw a gigantic redneck party entitled “Neptune’s
Conch” in their new McMansion. The FBI stake it out in one plotline and Zach
Galifinakis in another plotline dresses like James Bond in order to infiltrate
and rescue his now kidnapped love. This is one of those times when you wonder
what these obviously talented people would have come up with had they not been
given such a large budget to spend on gigantic spectacle. “Ghostbusters”
earlier this year had the same sort of problem in its climax. The movie slipped
into action movie territory upon the greased slide of easy money when it should
have been reaching an emotional climax in that higher territory where the best
comedy resides. In effect, the ending is weaker than the beginning or middle.
Still it’s a good movie. It tries to deliver laughs a minutes and much
more often than not succeeds.
